There is a point in your career when being excellent at your job stops being enough.

It often happens without much warning. It applies whether you work as an entrepreneur or when working for a larger company. You become the person people rely on, your responsibilities grow, and eventually you find yourself in a leadership role.

This is where the nature of the job starts to change.

The expertise that helped you build your career is still important, only now you are responsible for much more than your own work. You are making decisions that affect other people and navigating competing priorities, often needing to give direction when the path forward is not particularly clear.

It is a transition many people are asked to make with surprisingly little preparation.

Research conducted for the Lang School of Business at the University of Guelph found exactly that. In conversations with senior leaders, a consistent gap emerged between being highly capable in your field and being ready to lead. Organizations are good at developing experts, yet they are not always as deliberate about preparing those experts for what happens when their job requires leadership skills.

And that makes mid-career an interesting time to think differently about learning.

When the job changes before you do

Most careers reward expertise, particularly in the beginning.

You learn your field and get better at solving problems, building credibility along the way by knowing what you are doing and delivering good work.

It makes sense that the people who do this well are often the ones given more responsibility. The problem is that managing and leading require capabilities that may have had very little to do with what made someone successful in the first place.

Suddenly, success depends on how well you hire and whether people trust you enough to tell you when something is going wrong. It depends on how you give feedback to someone who is struggling and whether you can delegate work you know you could do faster yourself. It can also mean handling disagreement when there is no easy resolution.

These were some of the most significant gaps identified by the senior leaders interviewed for Lang. They described people who were strong technically and far less prepared for the human side of leadership.

There is no reason that a person should instinctively know how to do all of this simply because they have become senior enough to be responsible for it.

Learning to see beyond your own expertise

Leadership also changes the way you need to view the organization.

The Lang research describes a shift from thinking primarily about your discipline to thinking about the business as a whole. Someone can no longer make every decision solely through the lens of finance, law, technology, marketing, or whatever field brought them there.

Sometimes the best answer for your function is not the best answer for the organization.

That can be a difficult adjustment when your professional identity has been built around knowing your field exceptionally well. It requires curiosity about things outside your expertise and a willingness to listen to people who see the same problem differently.

It also requires judgment.

The leaders interviewed for the research talked about confidence and emotional intelligence, as well as the ability to navigate stakeholders, as capabilities that become increasingly important as people move into more senior roles. One CEO spoke specifically about the role confidence can play in women’s advancement: “Give women confidence and then they fly.”

Calling these “soft skills” can undersell what is happening. A difficult conversation with an employee is not soft, nor is making a decision with incomplete information or getting people who do not report to you to support a change they did not ask for.

These are skills, and like other skills, they can be developed.

We may also be learning leadership differently

For a long time, part of becoming a leader happened simply by being around other leaders.

You sat in meetings and watched how someone more experienced handled them, heard difficult conversations, and noticed how decisions got made. Not all of that learning was intentional. Some of it simply came from proximity.

That experience has become less consistent.

The senior leaders interviewed for Lang pointed to remote and hybrid work as one reason, with one participant describing it as “osmosis” being broken. AI introduces another complication. As technology takes on more routine work, some of the work people once did early in their careers, including the less glamorous work, may disappear with it. Yet that work often helped people develop judgment and understand how an organization operates.

Experience will always be an important teacher, although we may no longer be able to assume it will teach everything on its own.

Why learning feels different at mid-career

There is something else that changes when you return to learning later in your career: you have much more to bring to the table.

A conversation about leadership lands differently after you have managed someone through a difficult period, just as a case study about organizational change looks different after you have lived through one. Even a discussion about a bad manager takes on more meaning once you have had one, or worried that you might become one yourself.

You have reference points.

That may be why practical application came through so strongly in Lang’s conversations with senior leaders. They were interested in learning that could travel back into the workplace, rather than education that remained largely theoretical.

For someone in the middle of a career, the value of learning may be apparent almost immediately. You can try something that you learned in the program in a meeting the next morning, approaching a conversation differently, or recognizing a habit in yourself that you had never questioned before.

The classroom and the workplace begin reciprocally enhancing each other.

Maybe the next step isn’t about moving up

We tend to talk about careers as a series of moves upward. At mid-career, that definition of progress can start to feel incomplete.

There may still be another title you want or a role you are working toward. The more interesting question can be what will be required of you when you get there.

Because eventually, career growth becomes less about proving how much you know and more about how you mobilize the resources you control.

That transition, from expert in your field to leadership, does not happen automatically with experience, nor does it arrive neatly alongside a promotion. Sometimes you have to take action to learn it.

That is part of what the Master’s in Leadership at the University of Guelph’s Lang School of Business and Economics is designed to support. Created for working professionals, the program focuses on developing the leadership capabilities that become increasingly important as careers progress, while giving students the opportunity to apply what they are learning in the workplace as they go. Because you study virtually while still working at your job.

It is an approach that reflects something the senior leaders in Lang’s research came back to repeatedly: leadership development is most valuable when it changes what happens at work. The goal is not simply to know more, but to lead differently.

For someone at mid-career, that may be the most useful way to think about what comes next.

To learn more about the Lang Master’s in Leadership and how the program is designed for working professionals, visit the program website or connect with a program specialist.

Published in