Skip to content

The storytelling gap: Why women underclaim their achievements — and what it costs them

Women are accomplishing more than ever, but many still hesitate to clearly communicate their impact. The result is a visibility gap that can shape promotions, pay and leadership opportunities.

A project succeeds. A team reaches an ambitious goal. A difficult challenge is solved.

Then comes the question that often determines what happens next:

Who gets recognized for making it happen?

For many women, the answer is not always themselves.

Instead of saying, “I led this initiative,” they say, “I was fortunate to be part of a great team.”

Instead of highlighting the strategy they created, they focus on the people who helped execute it.

Instead of naming their contribution, they soften it.

This instinct is understandable. Many women are taught from an early age that confidence should be balanced with humility, that collaboration matters more than individual recognition and that being too direct about achievements can be perceived negatively.

But in workplaces where visibility influences advancement, consistently minimizing accomplishments can come with a real career cost.

Achievement alone is not always enough

Professional success is often described as a meritocracy: do excellent work, and opportunities will follow.

The reality is more complicated.

Research has consistently shown that advancement depends not only on performance, but also on visibility, sponsorship and the ability to communicate impact.

McKinsey and LeanIn.Org’s Women in the Workplace 2025 report found that women continue to face barriers moving into leadership roles despite making significant contributions at every level of organizations. One factor is access to opportunities that increase exposure, such as sponsorship and high-profile assignments.

But there is another piece of the equation that receives less attention: how women talk about what they have achieved.

A person’s career story is shaped not only by what they do, but by whether decision-makers understand the value of what they do.

The confidence double bind

The challenge is not that women lack ambition.

Research from social psychologist Amy Cuddy and other behavioural scientists has explored how confidence, self-presentation and perceptions of competence interact in professional settings. Women often face a difficult balancing act: they are expected to demonstrate confidence, but behaviours that signal confidence can sometimes be judged differently depending on gender.

This creates what many researchers describe as a double bind.

If a woman is too modest, her contributions may be overlooked.

If she is too assertive, she may face criticism for violating expectations about how women “should” communicate.

The result is that many highly capable women develop habits of qualification.

They use phrases like:

  • “I was lucky to have the opportunity.”
  • “I was just supporting the team.”
  • “We were able to accomplish this.”

Collaboration is important. But collaboration does not erase leadership.

Owning impact without taking all the credit

The solution is not for women to adopt a louder or more self-promotional style that feels unnatural.

Effective self-advocacy is not about taking credit away from others. It is about making contribution visible.

There is a difference between saying:

“I did everything.”

and:

“I brought together the strategy, aligned three teams and helped deliver a result that increased efficiency by 25 per cent.”

The second statement acknowledges both leadership and collaboration.

For women who find self-promotion uncomfortable, experts often recommend shifting the focus from personal praise to measurable impact.

Instead of describing effort, describe outcomes.

Instead of saying:

“I worked really hard on this project.”

Try:

“I led the project that reduced processing time, improved customer experience and helped the team achieve its target ahead of schedule.”

The facts tell the story.

Building a career narrative

Senior leaders and sponsors often need a clear understanding of someone’s strengths before they can advocate for them.

That means women need to be intentional about building a professional narrative.

This can include:

  • keeping a record of accomplishments and measurable outcomes
  • sharing successes with managers regularly rather than waiting for performance reviews
  • asking for feedback on leadership strengths
  • identifying sponsors who understand long-term career goals
  • becoming comfortable discussing achievements as evidence, not as self-promotion

As executive coach and author Sally Helgesen has written in her work on women’s leadership, many women’s strengths can become barriers when they are overused.

Collaboration, humility and relationship-building are powerful leadership qualities, but they should not prevent women from making their contributions visible.

The story women tell about themselves matters

Every career is shaped by moments of recognition.

The question is whether those moments are noticed.

Women should not have to exaggerate their accomplishments or become someone they are not to advance. But they do need to ensure that the value they create is understood.

Because the gap between achievement and recognition is not simply a confidence issue.

It is an opportunity issue.

And closing that gap starts with something surprisingly simple: learning to tell the full story of what women have already accomplished.